Journal Home
Search for

Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 163-166 (February 2010)


View previous. 10 of 11 View next.

The Difference Between Two Oral Appliances in Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Case Report

Ju-Hui Wua, Chung-Yao Hsubd, Chau-Hsiang Wangac, Huey-Er Leeac, Ting-Hsun Lana, Je-Kang DuaCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 9 December 2007; received in revised form 25 March 2008; accepted 1 April 2008.

Oral appliances are a range of devices that are designed to alter upper airway patency. The efficiency of these appliances for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been rarely discussed. This case report describes two designs of mandibular repositioning appliances used to treat OSA. A 36-year-old man was diagnosed with mild OSA by his physician. A single-piece, soft oral appliance and a two-piece, acrylic appliance were used in this patient. Polysomnography was performed three times (baseline, and with the single-piece, and two-piece appliances). The apnea/hypopnea index was improved significantly with both appliances, but to a greater degree with the single-piece soft appliance. Our study concluded that oral appliances may assist in the management of OSA.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

a Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

b Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

c Faculty of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

d Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Dr Je-Kang Du, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan

PII: S0929-6646(10)60037-X

doi:10.1016/S0929-6646(10)60037-X


View previous. 10 of 11 View next.